Students may have heard the term conic section before, or at least heard of the shapes circle, ellipse, hyperbola, and parabola. To begin the day's exploration, ask them how the shapes might be related. Most students who have not explored cutting a double-napped cone will be unfamiliar with the relationship. You might consider listing students' hypotheses on the board and leaving them up during the exploration. In this way, students can revisit their earlier ideas as they investigate the conic sections.
In this activity, students explore how a double-napped cone can be cut to create each of the 4 conic sections, as shown below. If students are unfamiliar with double-napped cones, you might want to have a model to show them. Inform students that all the conic sections can be created by passing a plane through a double-napped cone and looking at the cross section. However, do not tell them how to do this or show them the image below at this point.
Direct students to the Conic Section Explorer tool as their primary means of investigation. Before students begin their own explorations, discuss what the various parameters of the tool control and how they change the graph. If time permits or if you would like to allow an additional class day to complete the lesson, you might also consider building physical models out of a malleable material such as dough, which will give students a different perspective. See the Extensions for ideas on how to achieve this.
Hand out the Cutting Conics activity sheet. Read through the introductory text on the activity sheet as a class. You may wish to reference the hypotheses made earlier, the double-napped cone model, and the Conic Section Explorer tool as you do this. However, your goal should be to provide as little information as possible to the students, allowing them to discover the answers on their own. Simply clarify any questions on the meanings of new terms or the functionality of the online tool.
While students are experimenting with the online tool parameters to create conic sections, listen to group discussions regarding how they are deciding to cut the cone to create each cross section. What processes do they go through to discover the slope and position of the cut to create the required shape?
If students are struggling to create a given shape, you can direct their exploration with questions like:
- What happens if you change the slope of the cut?
[There is a continuum related to the angle of the cut:
- If the slope is 0, the cross section is a circle.
- If the slope is between 0 and the slant of the cone, the cross section is an ellipse.
- If the slope is greater than the slant of the cone, the cross section is a hyperbola.
- If the slope is equal to the slant of the cone, the cross section is a parabola.
Do not tell students these rules. Use them only as guidelines to help students.]
- What happens if you change the location of the cut and place it closer to the origin? What happens if you change the value of b
[As the cut gets closer to the origin:
- The size of circles and ellipses are decreased.
- Parabolas become less rounded at their vertex.
- The distance between vertices in hyperbolas decreases, and the vertices become less rounded.]
- What happens if you try to cut the cone through the origin?
[This creates "degenerate cases" where the cross sections are not unique to the double-napped cone. If the cut goes through the origin, the following occurs:
- If the slope is equal to the slant of the cone, a line is created.
- If the slope is less than the slant of the cone, a point is created.
- If the slope is greater than the slant of the cone, an X is created.]
If students use both the Conic Section Explorer tool and physical models to explore the conic sections, emphasize that they only need to write additional ideas for the second method used. They do not need to repeat observations they have already written down.
When students have completed their explorations, bring them together as a large group to discuss the answers to their answers. This is a good time to reread the hypotheses written on the board at the beginning of the class. Were they correct? If they were incorrect, can students now explain why things behaved differently? Let the students lead the discussion by having them share their answers.