Illuminations: Circle Packing

Circle Packing


Soda Cans

Soda cans are often packaged in rectangular arrays, but more efficient arrangements that require less packaging material are possible. In this lesson, students investigate various designs for packaging soda cans and use geometry to analyze their designs.

Learning Objectives

 
Students will:
  • Apply geometric concepts to a real-world problem.

Materials

 
Pennies (about 50 per group of students) or other congruent circular items
Soda Cans Activity Sheet

Instructional Plan

In this lesson, students will investigate two related problems. The first involves arranging soda cans on a shelf; students will explore this scenario by arranging pennies in a rectangular region. The second problem is more complex—students will attempt to determine the best possible package to carry more than one can of soda; that is, they will attempt to improve the designs currently used for six-packs and twelve-packs.

To stimulate interest in the lesson, allow students to do some research about soda by visiting the American Beverage Association web site. Students can share with the class some of the facts that they learn. Alternatively, you can find some information about soda on the web and present it to the class.

Then, give students the following problem to consider:

The Soda Warehouse arranges soda cans on refrigerated shelves. The shelves are rectangular. What arrangement will allow the maximum number of cans to be placed on a shelf?

To investigate this problem, give each student a copy of the Soda Cans activity sheet and about 50 pennies. (Other congruent circular shapes, such as bingo chips, tokens, or mock coins, could also be used.) Explain to students that the rectangle on the activity sheet represents the shelf, and the pennies represent soda cans. Students may point out that this model does not account for the volume of the can, only the area of the cross section. If that happens, explain that the shelves are arranged one on top of another with only enough room for the height of one can between them. Consequently, this model is sufficient to investigate the problem.

Soda Can Activity Sheet Soda Can Activity Sheet

For this part of the lesson, students should work individually. Note that the purpose of this activity is for students to consider various arrangements. For the moment, it is not necessary for students to determine the exact area that will be covered by cans, to prove that the cans will fit, or to verify that they have found the maximum number. Such calculations will, however, be required later when students investigate the second problem in this lesson.

As students explore, circulate through the room and note the results. To motivate students to find better arrangements, you might consider offering a small prize for the student who is able to fit the most cans on the shelf.

Once students have considered various arrangements and understand how the cans fit together, proceed to the second problem of this lesson:

Consider the packaging that is used to hold soda cans. How might this packaging be made more efficient? That is, can you place the soda cans in some other arrangement to reduce the amount of packaging that is needed?



Explain that soda companies often package cans in twelve-packs. Some packages are arranged in a 3 by 4 pattern, and other packages are arranged in a 2 by 6 pattern (known as a fridge pack). On the overhead or board, display the two arrangements shown below. Ask students to consider the question, "Which of these arrangements is more efficient? That is, which one has less unused space in the package?"

Allow students to think about this question for a minute; then, discuss it with a partner. After partners have shared, ask the class for their opinions. [Students will likely notice that neither arrangement is more efficient. Each package can be divided into twelve congruent squares, one square around each can, and there is the same amount of unused space in each square.]

Ask students to consider if there is another rectangular twelve-pack arrangement of m × n cans that would be more efficient. [No. All rectangular arrangements would have the same amount of unused space.]

Given this lead-in, allow students to work in pairs or small groups to devise an arrangement that would be more efficient. Be sure to point out that they can design a package for more or fewer than twelve cans, but explain that the minimum is three cans. You can also impose a maximum, but it is usually not necessary. However, students should consider that if there are too many cans in a package, customers will not be able to lift the package and carry it home.

To guide this investigation, you may want to assist students in determining a measurement for gauging the efficiency of a package. The simplest measurement is to consider the ratio of filled space within a package to total space. That is,

efficiency = area covered by cans ÷ area of entire package

At this point, you may want to have students calculate the efficiency of the twelve-packs considered earlier. [The radius of a soda can is approximately 3.2 centimeters, so the area covered by one can is approximately 32.15 square centimeters. The area of the square that surrounds a can is roughly 40.96 square centimeters. Therefore, the efficiency of the packages above is approximately 32.15 ÷ 40.96 = 78.49%. Note, however, that the actual dimensions of the soda can are irrelevant. If twelve circles of radius, r, are arranged as shown above, the efficiency is given by the equation:

which shows that for any radius, the efficiency will remain constant with this arrangement.]

Allow students to work on the problem for the remainder of class. As they work, circulate and talk to the groups. At the end of class—or at the beginning of the following class, if you want students to continue to work on the project at home—have each group of students present their best arrangement.

Questions for Students

 
Whether arranging cans on a shelf or in a package, which arrangements are more efficient than a rectangular array?
[There are several arrangements that are more efficient than a rectangular array. One such arrangement is an equilateral triangle with a smaller equilateral triangle removed from each vertex. The arrangement below shows such a package for six cans, although this arrangement could be extended.
triangle arrangement

There are many ways to find the area of the large equilateral triangle that surrounds the six cans. The simplest, however, is to find the side length and then use the formula

.

The dashed lines in the figure show a rectangle with dimensions r × 4r. On either side of this rectangle is a 30‑60‑90 triangle with shorter leg r; consequently, the longer leg is r√3. The side length of the large equilateral triangle, then, is 4r + 2r√3, and the area of this triangle is

The three small equilateral triangles removed from each vertex (shown in yellow in the figure on the right) have height r. Consequently, they have side length 2r/√3 and area,

so the area of all three small triangles combined is simply r2/√3. The total area covered by the six soda cans is 6πr2, so the efficiency rating for this package is

or approximately 84.17%.

Note that other packages—such as a hexagonal package surrounding seven cans arranged in a circle—are even more efficient.

Assessment Options

 
  1. Have students write a paragraph in their math journals about why some soda can arrangements are more efficient than others.
  2. Present students with an arrangement that is different from any that they devised. Have them compare this new arrangement with their best arrangement. Using the efficiency formula, they should explain which arrangement is better and why.

Extensions

 
  1. Consider the situation in three dimensions. Instead of just considering the amount of two-dimensional area that is unused within the package, students can consider the amount of material needed to create the package; that is, students can consider the surface area of the packages that they create.

Teacher Reflection

 
  • Were students actively engaged in this lesson? Explain why.
  • Determining the efficiency rating often involves a lot of computation. In what ways could technology be used to reduce the amount of computation required? Which computations would you still want students to do with paper and pencil?
  • Was your lesson developmentally appropriate? If not, what was inappropriate? What would you do to change it?

NCTM Standards and Expectations

 
Geometry 9-12
  1. Use geometric ideas to solve problems in, and gain insights into, other disciplines and other areas of interest such as art and architecture.

References

 
  • Froelich, Gary. “Modeling Soft-Drink Packaging.” Mathematics Teacher, September 2000, Vol. 93, No. 6. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
This lesson prepared by Samuel E. Zordak.
  
1 period   

NCTM Resources

Principles and Standards for School Mathematics


National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Thinkfinity Verizon Foundation
© 2000 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use